<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Larry's Personal &amp; Tech ramblings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitbank.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitbank.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Mobile 6 Phone Roundup by bitbank</title>
		<link>http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/windows-mobile-phone-roundup/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>bitbank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbank.wordpress.com/?p=71#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>An improved battery would help the Shadow, but it's odd keyboard layout still loses to the Vox's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An improved battery would help the Shadow, but it&#8217;s odd keyboard layout still loses to the Vox&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Mobile 6 Phone Roundup by Jay</title>
		<link>http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/windows-mobile-phone-roundup/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbank.wordpress.com/?p=71#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>Just noticed this...boxwave.com came out with an extended battery for the Shadow.. wouldn't that increase the battery life enough to put it up top?

I do like the Vox as well though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed this&#8230;boxwave.com came out with an extended battery for the Shadow.. wouldn&#8217;t that increase the battery life enough to put it up top?</p>
<p>I do like the Vox as well though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on C versus ARM ASM - a better example by bitbank</title>
		<link>http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2007/04/07/c-versus-arm-asm-a-better-example/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>bitbank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2007/04/07/c-versus-arm-asm-a-better-example/#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>Of course stmfd is used by the C compiler - it's for stacking and unstacking registers.  You missed the point.  The C compiler doesn't seem to use STM instructions for non-stack operations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course stmfd is used by the C compiler - it&#8217;s for stacking and unstacking registers.  You missed the point.  The C compiler doesn&#8217;t seem to use STM instructions for non-stack operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on C versus ARM ASM - a better example by Mehrdad Afshari</title>
		<link>http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2007/04/07/c-versus-arm-asm-a-better-example/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>Mehrdad Afshari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2007/04/07/c-versus-arm-asm-a-better-example/#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>I disassembled hello world binary generated by the iPhone gcc (unofficial) and the compiler had generated stmfd instruction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disassembled hello world binary generated by the iPhone gcc (unofficial) and the compiler had generated stmfd instruction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why write in Assembly Language? by AnyMouse</title>
		<link>http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/why-write-in-assembly-language/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>AnyMouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/why-write-in-assembly-language/#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>It really depends on what you are trying to accomplish.  Sure if you are writing for desktop applications using C or Java makes sense.  However, if you are writing the firmware for an embedded system, it often makes more sense to write assembly.  More code fitting into a smaller package means making the same product with the same functionality cheaper per unit to produce and run faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really depends on what you are trying to accomplish.  Sure if you are writing for desktop applications using C or Java makes sense.  However, if you are writing the firmware for an embedded system, it often makes more sense to write assembly.  More code fitting into a smaller package means making the same product with the same functionality cheaper per unit to produce and run faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SN76496 in ARM asm by Slaanesh</title>
		<link>http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/sn76496-in-arm-asm/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>Slaanesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbank.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. I will try and use this with my new port of MAME4ALL to the GP32.
You also mentioned something about an AY-3-8910 ARM ASM emulator. This would be very exciting for me as it could help speed up hundreds of games!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. I will try and use this with my new port of MAME4ALL to the GP32.<br />
You also mentioned something about an AY-3-8910 ARM ASM emulator. This would be very exciting for me as it could help speed up hundreds of games!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The obligatory iPhone blog entry by Floroskop</title>
		<link>http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2007/06/30/the-obligatory-iphone-blog-entry/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>Floroskop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2007/06/30/the-obligatory-iphone-blog-entry/#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>Hello! 
I think this try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!<br />
I think this try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My new T-Mobile Shadow by Jay</title>
		<link>http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2008/03/17/my-new-t-mobile-shadow/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbank.wordpress.com/?p=69#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>Glad you like the Shadow! I use it as well and is my favorite WM device :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you like the Shadow! I use it as well and is my favorite WM device <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SmartGear 0.40 is out by bitbank</title>
		<link>http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/smartgear-040-is-out/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>bitbank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/smartgear-040-is-out/#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>The inability to press 2 keys at once is a limitation of the device, not SmartGear.  I will try to add a workaround so that phones with this limit can be more functional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The inability to press 2 keys at once is a limitation of the device, not SmartGear.  I will try to add a workaround so that phones with this limit can be more functional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SmartGear 0.40 is out by TekGadget</title>
		<link>http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/smartgear-040-is-out/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>TekGadget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbank.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/smartgear-040-is-out/#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if you are planning fixes to the SP version of SmartGear to allow more than two simultaneous key presses (a must for Super Mario Bros.), and/or mapping diagonal d-pad directions (very hard to play Super C without!). Either one would increase the number of playable games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if you are planning fixes to the SP version of SmartGear to allow more than two simultaneous key presses (a must for Super Mario Bros.), and/or mapping diagonal d-pad directions (very hard to play Super C without!). Either one would increase the number of playable games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
